hmmm_tea: (Default)
So, over the past couple of weeks a whole load of politicians have spent time having petty arguments about who's responsibility it is to cut emissions rather than accepting their own responsibilities to cut their own.

Upshot of which we have another document that basically says there is a problem and something needs to be done about it, without implementing any real actions to do anything meaningful (and certainly nothing legally binding, so they couldn't back out when the economics don't work out in their favour). The only real compromise seems to be from the developing countries forced into doing so for their own survival as they get hit sooner by the serious impacts of climate change. To top it all off, it wasn't even approved, only ratified.

It may be a "historic first step", but if the steps are all going to be this small, we're going to have to make a lot of them and very quickly. Rather than doing anything to tackle the issue at hand we've opted for the dragging our feet in a global "lets cut emissions, you go first" strategy.

Why did it end up like this?

We live in a system focused on promoting ones own profit rather than sharing resources equally between those that need them. However much the politicians wanted to put in place measures to address climate change, they couldn't do it at the risk of damaging their economic position.

And so we've done another loop of the climate change policy cycle. There will be more protests, more political talks, more academics researching the issues and a million other things that won't mean a thing without being acted on, but at this rate no real action will be taken until it's far too late.

The capitalist system has failed us all, whether your rich or poor, over the past 2 weeks, but we'll still worship it's feet in our millions because that's what we do.

"Only when the last tree has died and the last river been poisoned and the last fish been caught will we realise we cannot eat money."
hmmm_tea: (Default)
The Today programme had Lord Carlisle on this morning talking about secret evidence and the justice system. I was particularly impressed with this quote:

99.99 recurring per-cent of people aren't terrorists


Hence, terrorists don't exist. Wahoo!

I love it when the "experts" say something completely stupid like that. I'm sure I've heard Jack Straw say something very similar.
hmmm_tea: (Default)
Today's [livejournal.com profile] foe_tips, offers the following piece of advice for helping to tackle climate change:

Have a Clothes Swap Party!


Presumably, they don't quite mean it in the way that springs to mind...

Oh, and 75
hmmm_tea: (Default)
I quite like xkcd ([livejournal.com profile] xkcd_rss). OK, not every one is funny, but there are some real gems.

It appears these people ([livejournal.com profile] xkcdsucks) doesn't share that opinion though amd are willing to write a post criticising each cartoon when they are released.

I think the tagline says it all really:
"[a] vitriolic and bitter collection of unwarranted nastiness about a silly and harmless comic."
hmmm_tea: (Default)
There are days when I feel just like this:

Excursion into the Mountains
by Franz Kafka (translated by Willa and Edwin Muir)


"I don't know," I cried without being heard, "I do not know. If nobody comes, then nobody comes. I've done nobody any harm, nobody's done me any harm, but nobody will help me. A pack of nobodies. Yet that isn't all true. Only, that nobody helps me - a pack of nobodies would be rather fine, on the other hand. I'd love to go on an excursion - why not? - with a pack of nobodies. Into the mountains, of course, where else? How these nobodies jostle each other, all these lifted arms linked together, these numberless feet treading so close! Of course they are all in dress suits. We go so gaily, the wind blows through us and the gaps in our company. Our throats swell and are free in the mountains. It's a wonder that we don't burst into song."


My book of Kafka's short stories may be taking me a while to read, but their are little gems like this that make it so worth it!

Now, where can I find a pack of nobodies? An excursion into the mountains sound so much more fun then this marking.
hmmm_tea: (Default)
Quentin Wilson on this morning's today program:

"We all know what too much reliance on satnavs causes - Driving off cliffs"


(or words to that effect, seem to have forgotten them a bit in the past 2.5 hours)

Perhaps we should implement compulsory use of satnavs as a new traffic calming measure?
hmmm_tea: (Default)
It appears twitter is a lot older than it seems:



(via @SciNewsBlog)
hmmm_tea: (Default)
So according to @qikipedia on twitter, "In Britain in 1993, three people needed hospital treatment as a result of an accident with a tea-cosy."

Thinking, I'd respond with the quote in the subject line, I had a quick look on google to see who said it (turns out it was Billy Connelly. It does sound like the sort of thing he'd say.), and found this:



Available from Ringtons - £7.95

Would it be excessive to buy myself a third tea-cosy?
hmmm_tea: (Default)
So, I finding it a scary thought that someone might actually want to vote for Boris Johnson tomorrow. A man who, let's face it, actively goes out of his way to appear a complete idiot.

However, an email from the Guardian today has found an even scarier thought, with this quote from Joan Ryan, MP for Enfield North:

"All the way though we've been warning people 'Boris isn't wearing any clothes' and only now are voters coming to us and saying, 'oh my goddddd, he's not wearing any clothes... and it's disgussssting'".


So, thanks to the Joan Ryan and the Guardian, I've now got an image of Boris Johnson naked in my head. I don't want it, so I thought I'd share it. Isn't it a lovely thought?

...What do you mean "no"?

Given the choice of voting for him or seeing him naked, I would like to say I'd martyr myself for the sake of the population of London, but I'm not sure I could face seeing it.

Luckily I don't have to, so tomorrow I can enjoy both not voting for him and not seeing him naked.
hmmm_tea: (Default)
On Friday I was on the train up to Cambridge and we were held outside Hitchin for a few minutes. As is often the case when this happens, the guard made an announcement to apologise for the delay. Expecting your normal "We've been held at a signal" reason, I was somewhat amused when he came out with the following:

"Apologies for the delay to this service, this is due to the application of the breaks"


Well, yes, you would hope that would make you stop (or at least slow down).
hmmm_tea: (Default)
"Everyone's producing cookbooks now, except the scientologists, but even they're planning one"


Eduord Cointreau at a seminar on Cookbooks and wine books yesterday.
hmmm_tea: (Default)
As there are still a few of the film quotes left, here's a second quote from each of them before I give you the answers:

Quotes )
hmmm_tea: (Default)
I don't normally bother with meme's, but this film one seems fun, so here's IMDB quotes from the first 15 films I could think of. Comment if you recognise any of them.

Quotes )
hmmm_tea: (Default)
B&Q to stop selling patio heaters

Definitely sounds like a good move, but it is interesting to note:

The Energy Saving Trust has estimated that a propane patio heater with a heat output of 12.5kW will produce around 34.9kg of CO2 before the fuel runs out (after approximately 13 hours). This is equivalent to the energy required to produce approximately 5,200 cups of tea (or 400 cups for every hour of operation)


Hmmm, keep warm outside for 13 hours or have 5,200 cups of tea? I think I know which one I choose...

November 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
910 1112131415
16171819202122
232425 26272829
30      

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 22nd, 2026 01:08 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios