'No fee degrees' university plan
We need to make the education system biased towards people who live near Universities? Oh, sorry, I didn't realise. Yes, of course people who live in big cities are far more entitled to this level of education then those of us from the countryside.
So, whatever happened to the idea of fair and equal access to education? Everytime there's a change to the funding system we seem to move further and further away from it. It's like the government are actively sitting down trying to think of new biases to add to the system.
How about this for an idea: use income tax to subsidise the education system to allow access to regardless of wealth, location, etc. It's perfectly fair as those that have been through university tend to be paid more and it would help even up the wealth too. Oh, yes, I forgot, we couldn't possibly do that, the rich clearly need their money...
We need to make the education system biased towards people who live near Universities? Oh, sorry, I didn't realise. Yes, of course people who live in big cities are far more entitled to this level of education then those of us from the countryside.
So, whatever happened to the idea of fair and equal access to education? Everytime there's a change to the funding system we seem to move further and further away from it. It's like the government are actively sitting down trying to think of new biases to add to the system.
How about this for an idea: use income tax to subsidise the education system to allow access to regardless of wealth, location, etc. It's perfectly fair as those that have been through university tend to be paid more and it would help even up the wealth too. Oh, yes, I forgot, we couldn't possibly do that, the rich clearly need their money...
no subject
Date: 2009-07-08 08:59 am (UTC)OK that's just insane.
Or maybe we should just all move to London. Because clearly that's the only place in the country which matters.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-08 09:13 am (UTC)Unfortunately, it seems that most people would rather pay lower income tax than subsidise people at University. I've heard some people call it a subsidy for the middle classes, on the premise that only middle class people would go to University and want government subsidy towards it. It's a flawed one, to say the least, but the days of major government subsidies for students are long gone. :(
no subject
Date: 2009-07-08 11:19 am (UTC)To be honest I'd rather see fewer University places and have proper funding in place (with tuition fees paid at the very least) than have this current system which seems to be aimed more at making parents happy and keeping the youth unemployment figures down than actually taking tertiary education seriously.
Of course that would also have to be combined with vocational qualifications which could be taken seriously (as they are, for example, in Germany) which would be a much bigger problem. Oh and properly funded for the long term, not just for three years and then the situation reviewed yet again, or funding cut, or having to re-appy...
*Oh and frankly, moving away was one of the bet things I ever did. At one time it had the highest per-capita assault rate in England and had almost the highest teenage pregnancy rate in the country. Almost everyone who did A Levels moved away as soon as they could.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-08 03:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-08 12:23 pm (UTC)The only one I can think of is Northumbria, which had a campus in Carlisle, but I suspect they only offered a limited range of courses there.
We clearly couldn't possibly implement any policy that would mean the greedy bankers would lose any of their lovely money...
no subject
Date: 2009-07-09 08:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-08 10:04 am (UTC)I'd support a graduate tax. Hell, I'd even be happy with the current student loan system (the repayment scheme makes it look a lot like a graduate tax, although I guess that some people are very unhappy with the idea of being in debt full stop) if it actually loaned people enough money to live on (my student loan was smaller than my college bill including rent, fees and some food) rather than assuming parents will support their grown up children financially (fortunately mine did).
no subject
Date: 2009-07-08 02:46 pm (UTC)Total OT, but I suspect that we saw you at the weekend in Chepstow. Unfortunately, I spent half the weekend putting together clues to confirm my suspicion about your identity, and the rest feeling too embarrassed to go up and say "hello! I might possibly know you online, unless you're someone else, in which case I don't."
no subject
Date: 2009-07-08 05:47 pm (UTC)Didn't know you were at Chepstow, otherwise would have probably ended up doing the same.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-08 08:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-08 09:10 pm (UTC)I think I was wearing a bright "safety green" gogs t-shirt that evening, but by the sounds of it you seem to have guessed that was me.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-10 07:07 am (UTC)Fees are now higher than living costs, so any parent who was going to end up paying (because you know, you're an adult now, so clearly your parents wealth is a sensible way of assessing what you have) the fees would be better off following the no fee approach.