hmmm_tea: (Default)
[personal profile] hmmm_tea
So, the The Morris Ring (1) have a problem with declining membership.

Let me see, could that be anything to do with their "oh no things can't ever change"/"we wouldn't even think of dancing anywhere near anyone who even looked like a woman" attitude (1)?

As far as I can see, there look to be quite a few young morris dancers around. Admittedly not in the ring though, whose average age seems on par with the combined age of the collections of the Natural History Museum (as mentioned above this may have something to do with their general outlook) (2).

Morris dead in 20 year? I don't think so...


(1) - For those that don't know, there are 2 other Morris organisations, The Morris Federation and Open Morris. Both organisations are somewhat younger than the ring and both have a somewhat more relaxed attitude to the whole tradition and who can dance thing.

(2) - OK, there are members of the ring who don't share that attitude, but there are those that do (to the extent that they won't dance in the same location as a side that include women) and as that is what the overall philosophy of the organisation appears to be.

(3) - OK, they're not quite that old, but having opened themselves up to ridicule, I'm happy to oblige.

Date: 2009-01-06 08:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] capra-maritimus.livejournal.com
So, the The Morris Ring (1) have a problem with declining membership.

Let me see, could that be anything to do with their "oh no things can't ever change"/"we wouldn't even think of dancing anywhere near anyone who even looked like a woman" attitude (1)?


That's my reason for not joining. Well, that anfd not living in the UK. :D

Date: 2009-01-06 10:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] king-pellinor.livejournal.com
It's not an attitude, it's an image. Unfortunately, it's a bugger to shake off :-(

I don't actually know anyone in the Ring who objects to women dancing, or to change. And as for youth, the Morris 18-30 is made up entirely of Ring members (or was last time I looked) :-) There are probably some rotten apples, but I've not come across them so they must be easy enough to avoid.

The problem seems to be more that there are people in the Open or Fed who have a grudge against the Ring... ;-)

Date: 2009-01-06 11:15 pm (UTC)
ext_57795: (Default)
From: [identity profile] hmmm-tea.livejournal.com
It's not entirely unfounded. I've seen rings sides refuse to dance with other sides because they include women.

Date: 2009-01-07 10:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] king-pellinor.livejournal.com
Well that is explicitly *not* Ring policy. Witness the Trafalgar Square dancing and its sequels, for example.

The only reason I've seen the Ring give for not having ladies' or mixed sides is that most of the members like being single-sex. There's no objection to ladies dancing (I keep getting accounted a member of a ladies' side myself), it's just nice to get away from them occasionally ;-)

Date: 2009-01-06 11:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] capra-maritimus.livejournal.com
My former co-squire doesn't mention that she's a morris dancer to the Morris Ring people she knows when she visits them in England (she also dances English Country and Clog). So I would guess that the attitude is still around to some extent.

If it is just an image (and it would be lovely if the image were wrong!) then perhaps they need to change that by, you know, embracing a certain amount of change.

Date: 2009-01-07 10:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] king-pellinor.livejournal.com
It's not an image I understand, based on the people I know in the Ring. What sort of change would you like? It may already be underway.

I suppose one of the problems with the Ring is that part of its appeal is that it's got lots of old-fashioned elements (sit-down dinners with ceremony and speeches at Ring meetings, for example), but that very thing seems to suggest that all the values are old-fashioned too, which I don't think is true. Ho hum :-D

Date: 2009-01-07 12:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
Oh, I see. I should probably add "Step 18. Assume the first organisation you find that claims to be is the de facto governing body of the subject at hand" to my list. Obviously they had, I just didn't know they might have been wrong :)

Date: 2009-01-07 03:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] packbat.livejournal.com
So to draw a comparison to U.S. politics...

November 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
910 1112131415
16171819202122
232425 26272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 22nd, 2026 01:02 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios