The Death of Morris
Jan. 6th, 2009 07:32 pmSo, the The Morris Ring (1) have a problem with declining membership.
Let me see, could that be anything to do with their "oh no things can't ever change"/"we wouldn't even think of dancing anywhere near anyone who even looked like a woman" attitude (1)?
As far as I can see, there look to be quite a few young morris dancers around. Admittedly not in the ring though, whose average age seems on par with the combined age of the collections of the Natural History Museum (as mentioned above this may have something to do with their general outlook) (2).
Morris dead in 20 year? I don't think so...
(1) - For those that don't know, there are 2 other Morris organisations, The Morris Federation and Open Morris. Both organisations are somewhat younger than the ring and both have a somewhat more relaxed attitude to the whole tradition and who can dance thing.
(2) - OK, there are members of the ring who don't share that attitude, but there are those that do (to the extent that they won't dance in the same location as a side that include women) and as that is what the overall philosophy of the organisation appears to be.
(3) - OK, they're not quite that old, but having opened themselves up to ridicule, I'm happy to oblige.
Let me see, could that be anything to do with their "oh no things can't ever change"/"we wouldn't even think of dancing anywhere near anyone who even looked like a woman" attitude (1)?
As far as I can see, there look to be quite a few young morris dancers around. Admittedly not in the ring though, whose average age seems on par with the combined age of the collections of the Natural History Museum (as mentioned above this may have something to do with their general outlook) (2).
Morris dead in 20 year? I don't think so...
(1) - For those that don't know, there are 2 other Morris organisations, The Morris Federation and Open Morris. Both organisations are somewhat younger than the ring and both have a somewhat more relaxed attitude to the whole tradition and who can dance thing.
(2) - OK, there are members of the ring who don't share that attitude, but there are those that do (to the extent that they won't dance in the same location as a side that include women) and as that is what the overall philosophy of the organisation appears to be.
(3) - OK, they're not quite that old, but having opened themselves up to ridicule, I'm happy to oblige.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-06 08:19 pm (UTC)Let me see, could that be anything to do with their "oh no things can't ever change"/"we wouldn't even think of dancing anywhere near anyone who even looked like a woman" attitude (1)?
That's my reason for not joining. Well, that anfd not living in the UK. :D
no subject
Date: 2009-01-06 10:41 pm (UTC)I don't actually know anyone in the Ring who objects to women dancing, or to change. And as for youth, the Morris 18-30 is made up entirely of Ring members (or was last time I looked) :-) There are probably some rotten apples, but I've not come across them so they must be easy enough to avoid.
The problem seems to be more that there are people in the Open or Fed who have a grudge against the Ring... ;-)
no subject
Date: 2009-01-06 11:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-07 10:32 pm (UTC)The only reason I've seen the Ring give for not having ladies' or mixed sides is that most of the members like being single-sex. There's no objection to ladies dancing (I keep getting accounted a member of a ladies' side myself), it's just nice to get away from them occasionally ;-)
no subject
Date: 2009-01-06 11:30 pm (UTC)If it is just an image (and it would be lovely if the image were wrong!) then perhaps they need to change that by, you know, embracing a certain amount of change.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-07 10:29 pm (UTC)I suppose one of the problems with the Ring is that part of its appeal is that it's got lots of old-fashioned elements (sit-down dinners with ceremony and speeches at Ring meetings, for example), but that very thing seems to suggest that all the values are old-fashioned too, which I don't think is true. Ho hum :-D
no subject
Date: 2009-01-07 12:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-07 03:13 am (UTC)