Add The Pence?
Mar. 13th, 2007 05:21 pmFrom ITV via the BBC and
morganmuffle:
Add the pence - two pounds, 25p, £1.47, 16p, fifty pence
First of all add everything together
200 + 25 + 147 + 16 + 50 = 438
Now add the other sums which are visible. 5p (from the 25p) + 47p (from £1.47) + 7p (again from £1.47) +6p (from 16p) = 65p
438 + 65 = 503
Now add the 'p' from 25p and 16p and the 'pence' from fifty pence giving an extra 3p.
503 + 3 = 506p
As far I as can see there is absolutely no way that is asking for that. The question is so open to start with that there are a range of answers I would be happy to argue as being the solution (2, 38, 50, 138, 438 or the solutions I've seen treating the pounds as old pounds or as a weight to list a few), but not that.
Why count the 5, 40 and 6 twice and 7 three times? I can't see any logical reason for doing this.
Add the pence - two pounds, 25p, £1.47, 16p, fifty pence
First of all add everything together
200 + 25 + 147 + 16 + 50 = 438
Now add the other sums which are visible. 5p (from the 25p) + 47p (from £1.47) + 7p (again from £1.47) +6p (from 16p) = 65p
438 + 65 = 503
Now add the 'p' from 25p and 16p and the 'pence' from fifty pence giving an extra 3p.
503 + 3 = 506p
As far I as can see there is absolutely no way that is asking for that. The question is so open to start with that there are a range of answers I would be happy to argue as being the solution (2, 38, 50, 138, 438 or the solutions I've seen treating the pounds as old pounds or as a weight to list a few), but not that.
Why count the 5, 40 and 6 twice and 7 three times? I can't see any logical reason for doing this.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-13 06:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-13 07:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-13 07:26 pm (UTC)"ITV has denied the problem was particularly complex"
not complex, no, just a random and irrational answer. (in the human, not the mathematical sense). *Lisa gets unnecessarily angry*
no subject
Date: 2007-03-13 06:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-13 07:17 pm (UTC)He didn't come in, just believed me when I said I didn't have one on the doorstep. They've not bothered me since.
Not sure why they trust me on my doorstep but not via the post though...
no subject
Date: 2007-03-13 06:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-13 07:15 pm (UTC)It's one of these premium phone in questions that have hit the news recently.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/6441463.stm
no subject
Date: 2007-03-13 07:27 pm (UTC)Ah, yes, I see.
Seems like fraud to me. Someone should be done for it.