Complementary Medicine On NHS
May. 23rd, 2006 09:26 amDoctors attack 'bogus' therapies
I'm really not sure what I think about this. My experience of complimentry medicine is limited (never really had it - other than some arnica I was given for my knee, which didn't seem to do much really).
However, regardless of whether it works or not people should be entitled to undergo the treatments if they believe that is what they want. The issue is whether the taxpayer should fund it or not.
In some ways I can see that as long as their is a vague possibility that it works and it reassures people then NHS funding is a good thing as it then makes it available to all. The question is then what gives to allow for this
Anyway excuse for poll:
[Poll #734385]
I'm really not sure what I think about this. My experience of complimentry medicine is limited (never really had it - other than some arnica I was given for my knee, which didn't seem to do much really).
However, regardless of whether it works or not people should be entitled to undergo the treatments if they believe that is what they want. The issue is whether the taxpayer should fund it or not.
In some ways I can see that as long as their is a vague possibility that it works and it reassures people then NHS funding is a good thing as it then makes it available to all. The question is then what gives to allow for this
Anyway excuse for poll:
[Poll #734385]
no subject
Date: 2006-05-23 08:51 am (UTC)xxx
no subject
Date: 2006-05-23 06:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-23 10:07 am (UTC)I'm not sure what the argument is about other than the interpretation of statistics...
no subject
Date: 2006-05-23 10:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-23 06:17 pm (UTC)Whether it helped the bruising and it just wasn't noticable because I was still dancing or it just didn't do anything will probably never be known...
no subject
Date: 2006-05-23 10:42 am (UTC)That seems to sum it up for me.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-23 06:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-23 12:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-23 01:07 pm (UTC)What we really need is more funding to investigate alternative methods of treatment.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-23 02:18 pm (UTC)Perhaps a double-blind experiment where not only do they not know who has the treatment, but they don't know what it is, and preferably neither do the report writers...
no subject
Date: 2006-05-23 07:14 pm (UTC)However, when I was truely crippled with my back, and physio was getting nowhere (and it turns out never was going to due to what I did), accupuncture gave me some impressive painrelief when I couldn't stnad the mindbendingly strong painkillers any more.
If there is genuine evidence something works (over and above the placebo effect), why not provide it, but when it is taking funding from things which are proven (such as physio) then there should definatly be some priorities.
"alternative" meds don't do themselves any favours by having their major supporters being airy-fairy-"alternative" wankers (sorry - but it's a very general observation). A good dose of science goes a long way.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-24 07:17 am (UTC)However: One problem with alternative medicine is that there are a number of frauds out there and that not all practices have a recognised professional qualification. Added to that, a lot of doctors are not open to the idea that someone without an MD might be able to sort out something they can't fix. Also the scientific tests used on orthodox medicines are not always appropriate to alternative medicines (yes, I know what that sounds like, but it's still true).
A lot of practitioners don't do themselves any favours either by coming across as very hippy and airy-fairy when to be taken seriously by people like the NHS and government decision-makers you must look and sound sensible and scientific.
I think alternative medicine should be available on the NHS if it can be proved to help people get better, whether scientifically or otherwise. After all, isn't getting people better what the NHS is for?
no subject
Date: 2006-05-24 03:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-25 10:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-25 10:00 pm (UTC)Thanks for letting me know...