hmmm_tea: (Default)
[personal profile] hmmm_tea
Godfrey was off to do a port tasting at UCL this evening (have had a lot of port sitting around the office for the past few days as we've got a tasting at work next week too...).

We decanted a couple of the vintages in the prep room before he left (and sampled them too of course).

Included in his line up for the evening was Cockburns 1977. For a wine that technically doesn't exist, it was very nice...

Date: 2005-11-30 10:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
Doesn't exist? Imaginary wine?

Date: 2005-11-30 10:51 pm (UTC)
ext_57795: (Default)
From: [identity profile] hmmm-tea.livejournal.com
Although Cockburns made a 77 vintage, they didn't declare it, so legally it doesn't exist and they certainly can't sell it.

Date: 2005-11-30 10:58 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
grumble grumble, meh meh. Had to make do with ULU's finest Strongbow this evening :(

Date: 2005-12-01 12:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
Why does that happen?

Date: 2005-12-01 09:26 am (UTC)
ext_57795: (Default)
From: [identity profile] hmmm-tea.livejournal.com
The port houses (individually) decide when the wine is about 2 years whether it is good enough to be a vintage or whether they'll just use the wine for blending, etc. There's normally about 3 vintages in every 10 years on average.

In '77 Cockburns didn't declare and most of it went for blending. They did bottle about a thousand bottles for personal consumption though...

November 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
910 1112131415
16171819202122
232425 26272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 23rd, 2026 12:28 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios